5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com. Anchor | neutral | “specific safety requirements are ' "intended to protect employees against their own negligence and folly as well as to provide them a safe place to work.” | 5 |
| 2 | Zarbana Indus., Inc. v. Hayes | neutral | “reflects this constitutional provision of authority and addresses vssr violations.” | 5 |
| 3 | State ex rel. G & S Metal Products, Inc. v. Moore | green | “must 'forewarn the employer and establish a standard which the employer may follow.” | 5 |
| 4 | State Ex Rel. Scott v. Industrial Commission | green | “because a vssr award is a penalty, a specific safety requirement must be strictly construed and all reasonable doubts concerning the interpretation must be resolved in favor of the employer.” | 4 |
| 5 | State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial Commission | green | “a 'specific requirement' is more than a general course of conduct or general duty or obligation flowing from the employer-employee relationship; rather, it 'embraces such lawful, specific and definite requirements or standards of conduct that are of a character plainly to app…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.