3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Wine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Wine Anchor | neutral | “r.c. 2953.21 governs petitions for post-conviction relief.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Andrews | green | “the filing of a petition for postconviction relief does not automatically entitle the petitioner to an evidentiary hearing.” | 8 |
| 3 | State v. Bradley, 14-08-27 (11-24-2008) | green | “where a defendant was represented by new counsel on direct appeal 'who was in no way enjoined from asserting the ineffectiveness of appellant's trial counsel,' claims of ineffective assistance must be brought on direct review.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.