4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kic v. Bianucci.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kic v. Bianucci Anchor | green | “a failure to cite relevant authority violates rule 341 and can cause a party to forfeit consideration of the issue.” | 13 |
| 2 | Skidis v. Industrial Commmission | green | “this court will not become the advocate for, as well as the judge of, points an appellant seeks to raise.” | 3 |
| 3 | Kic v. Bianucci | green | “is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.