2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 151 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Santiago-Rodriguez v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santiago-Rodriguez v. Holder Anchor | green | “in reviewing the decision of the bia, we consider only the grounds relied upon by that agency.” | 126 |
| 2 | Ayala v. Holder | green | “persecution was or will be on account of his membership in such group” | 25 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.