3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “a fact is considered material if its resolution could affect the outcome of the case under the governing law.” | 12 |
| 2 | Scarnati, J.,et al, Aplts. v. Wolf, T. | green | “summary judgment is appropriate where, after the close of pleadings, 'there is no genuine issue of any material fact as to a necessary element of the cause of action or defense which could be established by additional discovery or expert report.” | 5 |
| 3 | Sherman v. Kaiser | green | “where there are material issues of fact in dispute or if it is not clear that the applicant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the application will be denied.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.