5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kiely v. Graves.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiely v. Graves Anchor | green | “property is often analogized to a bundle of sticks representing the right to use, possess, exclude, alienate, etc.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lowe v. Rowe | green | “control over the land is part of the bundle of sticks associated with land ownership and use.” | 5 |
| 3 | In re the Welfare of C.B. | green | “that termination of parental rights is necessary to prevent harm or the risk of harm to children, rcw 13.34.180 and .190” | 4 |
| 4 | In re the Welfare of C.B. | green | “the opportunity to each parent to pursue a less restrictive alternative that the state must first encourage and offer before it seeks to terminate parental rights.” | 4 |
| 5 | In re the Welfare of C.B. | green | “these arguments ignore the fundamental holding of our prior decisions that rcw 13.34.180 and .190 do not violate due process under a strict scrutiny analysis because the court” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.