5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marshall Ex Rel. Marshall v. East Carroll Parish Hospital Service District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marshall Ex Rel. Marshall v. East Carroll Parish Hospital Service District Anchor | green | “to any other patient in a similar condition with similar symptoms.” | 5 |
| 2 | Repp v. Anadarko Municipal Hospital | green | “mere de minimus variations from the hospital's standard procedures do not amount to a violation of hospital policy.” | 5 |
| 3 | Battle Ex Rel. Battle v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport | green | “requires that participating hospitals give the following care to an individual who is presented for emergency medical care: (1) an appropriate medical screening, (2) stabilization of a known emergency medical condition, and (3) restrictions on transfer of an unstabilized individ…” | 4 |
| 4 | Wendy Guzman v. Memorial Hermann Hospital S | green | “differences between the screening examination that the patient received and examinations that other patients with similar symptoms received at the same hospital” | 4 |
| 5 | Guzman Ex Rel. Guzman v. Memorial Hermann Hospital System | green | “negligence in the screening process or providing a faulty screening or making a misdiagnosis, as opposed to refusing to screen or providing disparate screening, does not violate emtala, although it may violate state malpractice law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.