2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Taurus Holdings v. US Fidelity.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taurus Holdings v. US Fidelity Anchor | green | “if a policy provision is clear and unambiguous, it should be enforced according to its terms whether it is a basic policy provision or an exclusionary provision.” | 17 |
| 2 | James River Insurance v. Ground Down Engineering, Inc. | green | “insurance contracts are construed according to their plain meaning.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.