4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of West Covina v. Perkins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of West Covina v. Perkins Anchor | green | “individualized notice of state-law remedies which ... are established by published, generally available state statutes and case law.” | 7 |
| 2 | City of West Covina v. Perkins | green | “established by published, generally available state statutes and case law.” | 6 |
| 3 | Liberian Community Association v. Lamont | green | “cases from both the supreme court and the second circuit make clear that the federal procedural due process guarantee does not require state officials to inform individuals of all the procedural guarantees they enjoy under state law.” | 4 |
| 4 | Liberian Community Association v. Lamont | green | “that the federal procedural due process guarantee does not require state officials to inform individuals of all the procedural guarantees they enjoy under state law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.