5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from San Juan County, Utah v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Juan County, Utah v. United States Anchor | green | “determining whether the strength of the interest and the potential risk of injury to that interest justify intervention.” | 5 |
| 2 | Oklahoma Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Tyson Foods, Inc. | green | “the other factors in the test for untimeliness must also be considered.” | 5 |
| 3 | WildEarth Guardians v. National Park Service | green | “a somewhat liberal line in allowing intervention.” | 4 |
| 4 | Kane County, Utah v. United States | green | “in light of all the circumstances, including the length of time since the applicant knew of his interest in the case, prejudice to the existing parties, prejudice to the applicant, and the existence of any unusual circumstances.” | 4 |
| 5 | WildEarth Guardians v. National Park Service | green | “determining whether the strength of the interest and the potential risk of injury to that interest justify intervention.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.