7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Lanham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Lanham Anchor | green | “material omissions of fact can be interpreted as an attempt to 'cover up' or 'conceal' information” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Johnson | green | “extrapolation is an acceptable method to use in making a reasonable estimate of loss.” | 3 |
| 3 | Heath v. County of Aiken | green | “county 'employees' for purposes of section 4-9-30(7)'s personnel policies and grievance procedure” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Jonathan Pinson | green | “any person with authorization to act on behalf of the covered entity in some capacity, regardless of the person's official title” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Charise Stone | green | “once the government had satisfied its burden to offer evidence supporting its restitution calculation, the burden shifted to the defendants to dispute the amount with their own evidence,” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Dominic Demarcus Steele | green | “does not require absolute precision so long as there is a basis for reasonable approximation,” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Donald Bush | green | “the provisions of rule 404(b) are only applicable when the challenged evidence is extrinsic, that is, 'separate' from or 'unrelated' to the charged offense” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.