4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. Anchor | green | “the supreme court's opinion in medimmune represents a rejection of our reasonable apprehension of suit test.” | 6 |
| 2 | SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. | green | “reasonable apprehension of suit” | 6 |
| 3 | SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. | green | “the supreme court's opinion in medlmmune represents a rejection of our reasonable apprehension of suit test.” | 6 |
| 4 | Micron Technology, Inc. v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc. | green | “facilitates or enhances the availability of declaratory judgment jurisdiction in patent cases.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.