4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Anchor | green | “when the issue presented is purely one of law and either does not depend on the factual record developed below, or the pertinent record has been fully developed.” | 8 |
| 2 | Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | green | “the issue presented is purely one of law and either does not depend on the factual record developed below, or the pertinent record has been fully developed.” | 7 |
| 3 | Norman Hutton v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation | green | “nunies' report of 'shoulder pain' would not be sufficient to convince a reasonable jury that nunies had a physical impairment expected to last six months or longer, or that hie regarded him as such.” | 3 |
| 4 | Walton v. U.S. Marshals Service | green | “provide evidence that the employer subjectively believed that the plaintiff was substantially limited in a major life activity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.