3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal Mozes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal Mozes Anchor | green | “the intention or purpose which has to be taken into account is that of the person or persons entitled to fix the place of the child's residence.” | 9 |
| 2 | Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich David Harper and Shirley Harper | green | “to determine the habitual residence, the court must focus on the child, not the parents, and examine past experience, not future intentions.” | 7 |
| 3 | Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich David Harper and Shirley Harper | green | “focus on the child, not the parents, and examine past experience, not future intentions.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.