2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Citizens Health Corporation v. Kathleen Sebelius.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens Health Corporation v. Kathleen Sebelius Anchor | green | “the threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.” | 12 |
| 2 | Kim Construction Company, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Village of Mundelein | green | “existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.