2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lappe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lappe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “liberality and flexibility in evaluating qualifications should be the rule; the proposed expert should not be required to satisfy an overly narrow test of his own qualifications.” | 11 |
| 2 | United States v. Roxanne Lumpkin, Mario Williams | green | “will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.