3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jorge Mejia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jorge Mejia Anchor | green | “a district court's refusal to adjust a sentence to compensate for the absence of a fast-track program does not make a sentence unreasonable.” | 14 |
| 2 | United States v. Pereira | green | “it is well-established in this circuit that a district court does not err when it uses a prior offense to calculate both the offense level and the criminal history category to determine the correct guidelines range in unlawful reentry cases.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Jorge Mejia | green | “district court's refusal to adjust a sentence to compensate for the absence of a fast-track program does not make a sentence unreasonable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.