3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from His Excellency Vincente Cuesnongle v. Hector Ramos, Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | His Excellency Vincente Cuesnongle v. Hector Ramos, Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico Anchor | green | “even to think that a university could be found to have broken its contract when it changed the dates of classes, or the curriculum, for reasons beyond its control, or changed teachers, should startle anyone at all familiar with university life.” | 5 |
| 2 | Montecalvo v. Mandarelli | green | “conversion action will not lie for aln .. . intangible property right that is not manifested by a tangible instrument, such as a written agreement, a bankbook, or a promissory note, that may, in turn, be converted.” | 5 |
| 3 | Pickett v. Ditech Fin., LLC | green | “where there exists an express contract between the parties, equitable doctrines such as unjust enrichment are unavailable.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.