7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from O'CONNELL v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'CONNELL v. State Anchor | green | “one can imagine an orchestrated prompting of a witness by means of the media.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Darveaux | green | “was not so much an identification procedure as it was a confirmation of the identification that the witness had already made,” | 3 |
| 3 | Webster v. State | green | “the introduction of evidence of, or tainted by, unreliable pretrial identifications obtained through unnecessarily suggestive procedures.” | 3 |
| 4 | Sublet, Harris & Monge-Martinez v. State | green | “users create online profiles to share information about themselves with other facebook users.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Brandon Alves | green | “was not so much an identification procedure as it was a confirmation of the identification that the witness had already made,” | 3 |
| 6 | In re Johnny H. | green | “we find no basis for suppression in the fact that there may have been a civilian-arranged single-photo identification, made prior to the police procedure and without any police involvement.” | 3 |
| 7 | Thomas v. State | green | “some unnecessary suggestiveness in the procedures employed by police.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.