7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from King v. Graham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King v. Graham Anchor | green | “did not testify that he would have recommended against prosecution or that sutton would have followed that recommendation.” | 3 |
| 2 | King v. Graham | green | “the evidence offered to prove a vital fact is so weak as to do no more than create a mere surmise or suspicion of its existence, the evidence is no more than a scintilla and, in legal effect, is no evidence” | 3 |
| 3 | Fraga v. Drake | green | “then, when i was not making the monthly note payments on the home because they told me i could use the money for the repairs instead, and they made their confession to me in february 2002, i then filed suit.” | 3 |
| 4 | B & H Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. Engine Components, Inc. | green | “lay a foundation outlining exactly what specific representations were made and relied upon” | 3 |
| 5 | John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc. | green | “must be some act interfering with a contract or act persuading a party to a contract to breach; for example, offering better terms or other incentives” | 3 |
| 6 | Reynolds v. Murphy | green | “uphold the trial court's evidentiary ruling if there is any legitimate basis in the record for the ruling.” | 3 |
| 7 | Southtex 66 Pipeline Co., Ltd. v. Spoor | green | “a mere surmise or suspicion of fact,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.