3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montgomery v. Devoid.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montgomery v. Devoid Anchor | green | “are entitled to the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences.” | 11 |
| 2 | King v. Gorczyk | green | “when reviewing administrative action by the department under v.r.c.p. 75, we will not interfere with the department's determinations absent a showing that the department clearly and arbitrarily abused its authority.” | 6 |
| 3 | Rheaume v. Pallito | green | “if such review is otherwise available by law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.