7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bronson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bronson v. State Anchor | green | “pursuant to section 812.022(2), that a defendant had 'possession of property recently stolen.” | 3 |
| 2 | MF v. State | green | “in circumstantial evidence cases, the state must present evidence that is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” | 3 |
| 3 | Scobee v. State | green | “does not mean the possession must be separate from all other persons.” | 3 |
| 4 | Scobee v. State | green | “the joint possession of two or more persons acting in concert is 'exclusive' as to any one of them.” | 3 |
| 5 | EAB v. State | green | “sufficient evidence to support an adjudication exists when a 'rational trier of fact could find that the elements of the crime have been established beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
| 6 | Walton v. State | green | “the rule that possession of recently stolen goods carries with it the inference that the possessor is the guilty taker.” | 3 |
| 7 | T.A.K. v. State | green | “a judgment of dismissal is proper if the state fails to present sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.