2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fleming v. Rose.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fleming v. Rose Anchor | green | “when reviewing the grant of summary judgment, the appellate court applies the same standard applied by the trial court pursuant to rule 56(c), scrcp.” | 17 |
| 2 | Hansson v. Scalise Builders of SC | green | “the plain language of rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment . . . against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to the party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.