7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Pacific Land Research Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Pacific Land Research Co. Anchor | green | “if the people had not sought restitution ... the trial court could have ordered restitution on its own motion at the conclusion of the action on the merits.” | 3 |
| 2 | Burrus v. Municipal Court | green | “writs are occasionally used to provide expedited interlocutory review of pleading issues, some extraordinary reason for this kind of priority treatment must appear.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Hy-Lond Enterprises, Inc. | green | “the right of the district attorney to surrender the powers of the attorney general and his fellow district attorneys to commence, when appropriate, actions in other counties under the ucl.” | 3 |
| 4 | Steen v. Appellate Division, Superior Court | green | “conference' with the district attorneys to discuss their duties 'with the view of uniform and adequate enforcement' of state law.” | 3 |
| 5 | Singh v. Superior Court | green | “limited territorially to the county for which he has been elected,” | 3 |
| 6 | People Ex Rel. Harris v. Aguayo | green | “restitution is not intended to benefit the recipient by the return of money, but instead is designed to penalize a defendant for past unlawful conduct and thereby deter future violations.” | 3 |
| 7 | People ex rel. Lockyer v. Fremont Life Insurance | green | “lockyer was an action brought by the attorney general against an insurance company, in which the trial court ordered the defendant to make an offer of classwide or” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.