Topic: increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1950

7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 147 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Brandenburg (Slip Opinion).

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Brandenburg (Slip Opinion) Anchor
ohio · 2016
green “increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law or (2) unsupported by the record.” 49
2 State v. Ahlers
ohioctapp · 2016
green “considers the principles and purposes of r.c. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in r.c. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.” 44
3 State v. Harp
ohioctapp · 2016
green “the record does not support the trial court's findings under relevant statutes or that the sentence is otherwise contrary to law.” 33
4 State v. Steger
ohioctapp · 2016
green “the trial court that, in imposing a sentence, determines the weight afforded to any particular statutory factors, mitigating grounds, or other relevant circumstances.” 7
5 State v. Ahlers
ohioctapp · 2016
green “clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the trial court considers the principles and purposes of r.c. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in r.c. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.” 5
6 State v. Brandenburg (Slip Opinion)
ohio · 2016
green “that is, an appellate court may vacate or modify any sentence that is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law only if the appellate court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the sentence.” 5
7 State v. Steger
ohioctapp · 2016
green “the trial court, in imposing a sentence, determines the weight afforded to any particular statutory factors, mitigating grounds, or other relevant circumstances.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check