3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bryce Markham v. Tony Wertin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bryce Markham v. Tony Wertin Anchor | green | “when the meaning of contract terms is not the subject of dispute,' mere reference to or consultation of a cba 'plainly does not require the claim to be extinguished.” | 5 |
| 2 | Wade Boldt v. Northern States Power Company | green | “a substantially dependent claim under the lmra is one that requires the interpretation of some specific provision of a .” | 5 |
| 3 | Navarro v. American National Skyline Inc. | green | “301 does not grant the parties to a the ability to contract for what is illegal under state law” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.