2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walter Quijada-Aguilar v. Loretta E. Lynch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walter Quijada-Aguilar v. Loretta E. Lynch Anchor | green | “cat claims must be considered in terms of the aggregate risk of torture from all sources, and not as separate, divisible cat claims.” | 16 |
| 2 | Aguilar-Ramos v. Holder | green | “the regulations implementing cat explicitly require the ij to consider 'all evidence relevant to the possibility of future torture.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.