7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McGranahan v. McGough.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGranahan v. McGough Anchor | green | “the nature and extent of an employer's subrogation rights under the workers compensation statutes are matters for legislative determination.” | 3 |
| 2 | Stemple v. Maryland Casualty Co. | green | “combination of contract and tort.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co. | green | “to perpetuate incorrect analysis of workers compensation statutes and it will reject rules that were originally erroneous or are no longer sound.” | 3 |
| 4 | Loucks v. Gallagher Woodsmall, Inc. | green | “only prevents double recovery from a third-party tortfeasor and not contractual rights contained in an employer's automobile policy.” | 3 |
| 5 | Wimp v. American Highway Technology | green | “essentially and realistically unemployable.” | 3 |
| 6 | Wimp v. American Highway Technology | green | “review a challenge to the board's factual findings in light of the record as a whole to determine whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 3 |
| 7 | Ullery v. Othick | green | “speculate as to the legislative intent behind it or read into the statute something not readily found in it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.