7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Eckley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Eckley Anchor | green | “is to determine whether to impose or execute a sentence for the offense of which the defendant has already been convicted and for which probation was granted” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Eckley | green | “the criminal justice commission did not intend to authorize revocation absent a violation of a condition of supervision or the commission of a new crime.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Benoit | green | “those uniquely criminal procedures” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Benoit | green | “too many penal characteristics not to be a 'criminal prosecution' under article i, section 11 of the constitution.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Kelemen | green | “the criminal justice commission did not intend to authorize the revocation of probation in the absence of a finding that an offender had violated the conditions of pro- bation either by committing a new crime or in some other way” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Martin | green | “right to confront and cross-examine a witness , unless the state demonstrates good cause to deny that right.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Freeman | neutral | “carries stigmatiz- ing or condemnatory significance.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.