3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Denham v. Superior Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Denham v. Superior Court Anchor | green | “a necessary corollary to this rule is that if the record is inadequate for meaningful review, the appellant defaults and the decision of the trial court should be affirmed.” | 14 |
| 2 | Cairns v. Cairns | green | “support each point by argument and, if possible, by citation of authority” | 4 |
| 3 | Cairns v. Cairns | green | “support each point by argument and, if possible, by citation of authority.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.