7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Tillis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Tillis Anchor | green | “to establish on appeal a violation of section 1054.1, subdivision (a), in failing to disclose a witness, the record must affirmatively demonstrate that a specific witness or witnesses were known to and intended to be called by the prosecutor, but were undisclosed to the defense …” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Tabb | green | “a judicial officer shall have the power to impose reasonable money sanctions, not to exceed fifteen hundred dollars (1,500), notwithstanding any other provision of law, payable to the court, for any violation of a lawful court order by a person, done without good cause or substa…” | 3 |
| 3 | Conservatorship of Becerra | green | “assess the record for substantial evidence to support the court's express or implied findings.” | 3 |
| 4 | Sandeffer v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO CTY. | green | “may order defense counsel to produce information or materials the court reasonably finds have been improperly withheld, notwithstanding counsel's protestations to the contrary,” | 3 |
| 5 | Hubbard v. Superior Court | green | “is a pure creature of statute, in the absence of which, there can be no discovery” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Lamb | green | “it's absolutely clear that you never provided possibly exculpatory information that you had.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Jackson | green | “because the testimony was allegedly exculpatory, the trial court refused to believe defense counsel did not seriously consider calling the witness until moments before he did” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.