4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte JR.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte JR Anchor | green | “an appellate court must find, within the record, clear and convincing evidence in order to affirm a juvenile court's determination at the disposition hearing that it is in the best interest of the child or the public to transfer the child for criminal prosecution.” | 10 |
| 2 | AM v. State | green | “a transfer hearing is not a hearing to adjudicate the guilt or innocence of the accused, but instead is a probable cause hearing, to determine whether the juvenile should be transferred out of the juvenile court for prosecution as an adult.” | 4 |
| 3 | OM v. State | green | “evidence admissible over a hearsay objection may be inadmissible because it violates the right of confrontation and cross-examination.” | 4 |
| 4 | Jelks v. State | green | “(d) evidence of the following and other relevant factors shall be considered in determining whether the motion shall be granted:” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.