7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trotter v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trotter v. State Anchor | green | “the objectionable juror must be an individual who actually sat on the jury and whom the party either challenged for cause or attempted to challenge peremptorily or otherwise objected to after his peremptory challenges had been exhausted.” | 3 |
| 2 | Weinstein Design Group, Inc. v. Fielder | green | “expenditure of a peremptory challenge to cure the trial court's improper denial of a cause challenge constitutes reversible error if a party exhausts all remaining peremptory challenges and can show that an objectionable juror has served on the jury.” | 3 |
| 3 | Kochalka v. Bourgeois | green | “juror's acknowledgment of bias in favor of one party-regardless of which party it was-should have disqualified her from serving on the jury.” | 3 |
| 4 | Pelham v. Walker | green | “a juror should be excluded for cause when her statements confirm that she cannot set aside 'the edge' that she would give one party at the beginning of the case.” | 3 |
| 5 | Pelham v. Walker | green | “close cases involving challenges to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to impartiality.” | 3 |
| 6 | Pelham v. Walker | green | “we apply the abuse of discretion standard to a trial court's decision to deny a challenge for cause to a potential juror.” | 3 |
| 7 | Embleton v. Senatus | green | “close cases involving challenges to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to impartiality.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.