5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044) Anchor | green | “if the plain language leads to a clear and unambiguous result, then the interpretative process is over.” | 5 |
| 2 | Shelton v. Restaurant.com, Inc. | green | “turn to extrinsic tools to discern legislative intent . . . only when the statute is ambiguous, the plain language leads to a result inconsistent with any legitimate public policy objective, or it is at odds with a general statutory scheme.” | 5 |
| 3 | Spade v. Select Comfort Corp. | green | “we construe the words of a statute 'in context with related provisions so as to give sense to the legislation as a whole.” | 5 |
| 4 | Spade v. Select Comfort Corp. | green | “accordingly, 'the starting point of all statutory interpretation must be the language used in the enactment.” | 4 |
| 5 | In Re Greater Brunswick Charter Sch. | green | “regulations allowing regional charter schools are a legitimate means of effectuating the act's purpose of encouraging the establishment of charter schools.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.