5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Close.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Close Anchor | green | “in judging the police officer's conduct, we apply an objective standard: 'would the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure "warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Close | green | “the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Absher | green | “the circuit court's factual findings are upheld unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence.” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Mott | green | “where a traffic stop is based upon a mistake of law, it is unconstitutional.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Absher | green | “point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.