7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Un. Consumers Club, Inc. v. Attorney Gen., State of Ill..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Un. Consumers Club, Inc. v. Attorney Gen., State of Ill. Anchor | green | “an interpretive rule is any rule an agency issues without exercising delegated legislative power to make law through rules.” | 3 |
| 2 | In re Kurtis C. | green | “capable of repetition yet evading review exception.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Kurtis C. | green | “the 'capable of repetition yet evading review' exception requires the complaining party to show that (1) the challenged action is too short in duration to be fully litigated prior to its cessation, and (2) there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party would b…” | 3 |
| 4 | Fagel v. Department of Transportation | green | “must consider only those facts apparent from the face of the pleadings, judicial admissions in the record and matters subject to judicial notice.” | 3 |
| 5 | Riverboat Development Corp. v. Illinois Gaming Board | green | “if an agency does not 'follow the proper procedure for adoption of a rule, the rule is invalid.” | 3 |
| 6 | Riverboat Development Corp. v. Illinois Gaming Board | green | “jurisdiction shall extend under this act to every person, association, corporation, partnership and trust involved in riverboat gambling operations in the state of illinois.” | 3 |
| 7 | Riverboat Development Corp. v. Illinois Gaming Board | green | “to conduct investigations, searches, seizures, arrests, and other duties imposed under this act and to exercise all of the rights and powers of peace officers.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.