7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Burton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Burton Anchor | green | “inflame the passions of jurors” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Henry Brown | green | “found no illinois case law that expressly allowed or prohibited the acquisition of csli without a search warrant” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Henry Stephens | green | “widely and reasonably understood,” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Deramus | green | “gets paid a lot of money to do what she does.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Williams | green | “to catch criminals who are reckless with phones.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Johnson | green | “on the issues of his intent, motive, design, knowledge, absence of mistake, and propensity.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Strickland | green | “found no illinois case law that expressly allowed or prohibited the acquisition of csli without a search warrant” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.