Topic: however, we 'are not required to accept as true any unwarra… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #19851

4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guarrasi v. Scott.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Guarrasi v. Scott Anchor
pacommwct · 2011
green “however, we 'are not required to accept as true any unwarranted factual inferences, conclusions of law or expressions of opinion.” 7
2 Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Protection
pacommwct · 2015
green “in ruling on preliminary objections, the courts must accept as true all well-pled facts that are material and all inferences reasonably deducible from the facts.” 7
3 Guarrasi v. Scott
pacommwct · 2011
green “to sustain preliminary objections, 'it must appear with certainty that the law will permit no recovery' and 'any doubt must be resolved in favor of the non-moving party.” 5
4 Guarrasi v. Scott
pacommwct · 2011
green “are not required to accept as true any unwarranted factual inferences, conclusions of law or expressions of opinion.” 2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check