3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. Spokane.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. Spokane Anchor | green | “reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.” | 8 |
| 2 | NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. Spokane | green | “the adequacy of a search is judged by a standard of reasonableness, that is, the search must be reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.” | 7 |
| 3 | Forbes v. City of Gold Bar | green | “purely speculative claims about the existence and discoverability of other documents will not overcome an agency affidavit, which is accorded a presumption of good faith.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.