7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pratt v. Nelson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pratt v. Nelson Anchor | green | “considering only whether the trial court correctly applied the law and correctly concluded that no disputed issues of material fact existed.” | 3 |
| 2 | Blackner v. State, Departmant of Transportation | green | “when interpreting a statute, our goal is to give effect to the legislature's 39 alternatively, plaintiffs argue that even if wildlife is a natural condition, the second bear attack was not "natural” | 3 |
| 3 | Grappendorf v. Pleasant Grove City | green | “from these definitions, it follows that a natural condition 'on' the land must be topographical in nature” | 3 |
| 4 | Grappendorf v. Pleasant Grove City | green | “lacking both explanation and textual analysis.” | 3 |
| 5 | Grappendorf v. Pleasant Grove City | green | “used to indicate . . . a position above and in contact with” | 3 |
| 6 | Webb v. University of Utah | green | “a special relationship is what is required to give rise to a duty to act, whereas the existence of a special relationship relating to a governmental actor can result in the imposition of liability for either her acts or her failure to act.” | 3 |
| 7 | Herriman Irrigation Co. v. Keel | green | “the law of the case doctrine was developed in the interest of economy and efficiency to avoid the delays and difficulties involved in repetitious contentions and reconsideration of rulings on matters previously decided in the same case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.