7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. Securities Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. Securities Litigation Anchor | green | “such indifference to the truth of the pleading's . . . most important factual allegations . . . is the sort of conduct that rule 11 . . . seeks to deter.” | 3 |
| 2 | Childers v. New York & Presbyterian Hospital | green | “in a conclusory fashion, that there was an express contractual relationship between the parties, but it did not include any details regarding this alleged express contract” | 3 |
| 3 | City of Perry v. Procter & Gamble Co. | green | “requires a plaintiff to adequately specify the statements it claims were false or misleading, give particulars as to the respect in which the plaintiff contends the statements were fraudulent, state when and where the statements were made, and identify those responsible for the …” | 3 |
| 4 | Galin v. Hamada | green | “the papers and affidavits submitted by the defendants were more than sufficient to persuade the court that the plaintiffs' allegations of fraud had no basis in fact” | 3 |
| 5 | Jennings v. Hunt Cos. | green | “may, and generally will, deem a claim abandoned when a counseled plaintiff fails to respond to a defendant's arguments that the claim should be dismissed.” | 3 |
| 6 | Response Personnel, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance | green | “the parties' briefs assume that new york law controls. therefore, under the new york choice-of-law rule, new york law applies.” | 3 |
| 7 | Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. | green | “the existence of a special or privity-like relationship imposing a duty on the defendant to impart correct information to the plaintiff.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.