4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re A.J.S., 2007 Ca 2 (6-29-2007).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re A.J.S., 2007 Ca 2 (6-29-2007) Anchor | green | “issues relating to the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given the evidence are primarily for the trier of fact.” | 8 |
| 2 | In re S.J. | green | “r.c. 2151.414 establishes a two-part test for courts to apply when determining a motion for permanent custody to a public services agency.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re A.U., 22264 (1-11-2008) | green | “will not be overturned as against the manifest weight of the evidence if the record contains competent, credible evidence by which the court could have formed a firm belief or conviction that the essential statutory elements for a termination of parental rights have been establi…” | 5 |
| 4 | In Re A.U., 22264 (1-11-2008) | green | “if the record contains competent, credible evidence by which the court could have formed a firm belief or conviction that the essential statutory elements for a termination of parental rights have been established.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.