4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Persohn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Persohn Anchor | green | “the list of acceptable reasons for admitting testimony of prior bad acts into evidence is non-exhaustive.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Ahmed, Unpublished Decision (6-16-2005) | green | “a defendant's claim of prejudice is negated when: (1) evidence of the other crimes would have been admissible as 'other acts' evidence under evid.r. 404(b) or (2) the evidence of each crime joined at trial is simple and direct.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. May | green | “however, there are exceptions to the general rule: "it may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Wright | green | “evidence is 'simple and direct' if (1) the jury is capable of readily separating the proof required for each offense, (2) the evidence is unlikely to confuse jurors, (3) the evidence is straightforward, and (4) there is little danger that the jury would 'improperly consider test…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.