7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bowman v. The Chicago Park District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowman v. The Chicago Park District Anchor | green | “a course of action which shows an actual or deliberate intention to cause harm or which, if not intentional, shows an utter indifference to or conscious disregard for the safety of others or their property.” | 3 |
| 2 | Brunton v. Kruger | green | “any road which provides access to fishing, hunting, or primitive camping, recreational, or scenic areas and which is not a (1) city, town or village street, (2) county, state or federal highway or (3) a township or other road district highway.” | 3 |
| 3 | Brunton v. Kruger | green | “to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature.” | 3 |
| 4 | Thurman v. Champaign Park District | green | “no other contrary conclusion can be drawn” | 3 |
| 5 | Thurman v. Champaign Park District | green | “to the exclusion of inconsistent common-law definitions.” | 3 |
| 6 | Barr v. Cunningham | green | “acted with conscious disregard for the safety of the others” | 3 |
| 7 | Palmer v. Chicago Park District | green | “no corrective action to repair or warn about” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.