7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ellen Lucille Smith, etc. v. Southland Suites of Ormond Beach, LLC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ellen Lucille Smith, etc. v. Southland Suites of Ormond Beach, LLC. Anchor | green | “verified the constitutionality of the cpc,” | 3 |
| 2 | Walsh v. State | green | “the maximum sentence is up to the statutory maximum for the primary and any additional offenses as provided in s. 775.082, f.s., unless the lps, exceeds the statutory maximum.” | 3 |
| 3 | Fernandez v. State | green | “although it is true that the lps exceeds the statutory maximum sentence for a single grand theft, it does not exceed ms. hall's maximum sentence under her scoresheet, which is ten years' imprisonment.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jose Martinez v. State of Florida | green | “a sentence that patently fails to comport with statutory or constitutional limitations is by definition 'illegal.” | 3 |
| 5 | Martinez v. State | green | “under the cpc, given the total sentencing points, the trial court was required, absent a valid reason for departure, to sentence the defendant to the lps for each crime” | 3 |
| 6 | Fudge v. State | green | “misdemeanors cannot be scored as primary offenses at conviction.” | 3 |
| 7 | Silvera v. State | green | “the sentences imposed by the trial court in this case exceeded those authorized by the cpc.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.