5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Morgan Stanley & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Anchor | green | “numerosity is presumed for classes larger than forty members.” | 9 |
| 2 | Singh v. Joshi | green | “in a 1983 suit brought to enforce procedural due process rights, a court must determine (1) whether a property interest is implicated, and, if it is, (2) what process is due before the plaintiff may be deprived of that interest.” | 3 |
| 3 | General Mills, Inc. v. Chobani, LLC | green | “a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” | 3 |
| 4 | N.J. v. New York | green | “this higher standard is particularly appropriate when a plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction against a government body such as a school district.” | 3 |
| 5 | Stinson v. City of New York | green | “in order to defeat class certification, there must be a showing of a genuine conflict between the proposed class representative's interests and those of the other members of the class, and only a conflict that goes to the very subject matter of the litigation will defeat a party…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.