Topic: primary jurisdiction doctrine involves a question of timing… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #19979

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bradley v. The City of Marion Illinois.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Bradley v. The City of Marion Illinois Anchor
illappct · 2015
green “primary jurisdiction doctrine involves a question of timing, not of judicial competence to hear a particular case” 3
2 Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corp.
ill · 2011
green “a court has jurisdiction over a matter, it should in some instances stay the judicial proceedings pending referral of a controversy, or some portion of it, to an administrative agency having expertise in the area.” 3
3 Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corp.
ill · 2011
green “promoting proper relationships between the courts and administrative agencies charged with particular regulatory duties.” 3
4 Hastings Mutual Insurance Company v. Ultimate Backyard
illappct · 2012
green “interpreted the doctrine to stand only for the proposition that a circuit court may, in certain circumstances, stay its own judicial proceedings pending the referral of a controversy to an administrative agency having specialized expertise over the disputed subject matter.” 3
5 Stanphill v. Ortberg
ill · 2018
green “the doctrine of primary jurisdiction is a judicially created doctrine that is not technically a question of jurisdiction, but a matter of self-restraint and relations between the courts and administrative agencies.” 3
6 West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. TRRS Corp.
illappct · 2019
green “while the doctrine of primary jurisdiction requires the circuit court to consider west bend's late notice issue, it does not provide that the administrative proceedings in the iwcc should be stayed pending its resolution.” 3
7 West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. TRRS Corp.
illappct · 2019
green “interpreted the doctrine to stand only for the proposition that a circuit court may, in certain circumstances, stay its own judicial proceedings pending the referral of a controversy to an administrative agency having specialized expertise over the disputed subject matter.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check