Topic: each case must be evaluated on its own and depending on the… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #20001

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Taylor.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 People v. Taylor Anchor
ill · 2011
green “each case must be evaluated on its own and depending on the facts of the case, some of the factors may not be relevant or additional factors may need to be considered.” 3
2 People v. Rolfe
illappct · 2004
green “marked disfigurement and a threat to her health.” 3
3 People v. Rolfe
illappct · 2004
green “the shocking injuries and the ferocity with which the defendant inflicted those upon his victims were such that no sane adult would have engaged in such brutality or inflicted such injuries unless he intended to extinguish their lives.” 3
4 People v. Viramontes
illappct · 2017
green “not appear to have factored into the sangster court's analysis when it determined the trial court did not err” 3
5 People v. Viramontes
illappct · 2017
green “the fact that the audio recordings exist at all demonstrates that the system was acting correctly.” 3
6 People v. Hollahan
illappct · 2019
green “inhibited the jurors' deliberations.” 3
7 People v. Hollahan
ill · 2020
green “inhibited the jurors' deliberations.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check