6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Hendricksen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Hendricksen Anchor | green | “whether multiple punishments were imposed contrary to legislative intent presents a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. Ricks | green | “generally, the same degree of certainty must be used to describe the goods in indictments for obtaining property by false pretenses as in indictments for larceny.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Ricks | green | “must be described with reasonable certainty and by the name or term usually employed to describe it.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Jones | green | “additionally, 'it is the general rule that the thing obtained by the false pretense must be described with reasonable certainty, and by the name or term usually employed to describe it.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Davis | green | “is not required to produce 'direct evidence of ... value' to support the conclusion that the stolen property was worth over 1,000.00, provided that the jury is not left to 'speculate as to the value' of the item.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Davis | green | “the state did not have to prove that a dvd player without its brain was worth over 1,000.00, as long as the state provided some evidentiary basis that placed the jury's determination of its value beyond 'speculation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.