5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu Anchor | green | “must address every claim the petitioner has challenged.” | 6 |
| 2 | HP Inc. v. MPHJ Technology Investment., LLC | green | “the noninstituted grounds do not become a part of the ipr. accordingly, the noninstituted grounds were not raised and, as review was denied, could not be raised in the ipr. therefore, the estoppel provisions of 315(e)(1) do not apply.” | 4 |
| 3 | PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS v. IANCU | green | “equal treatment of claims and grounds for institution purposes has pervasive support in sas.” | 4 |
| 4 | PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS v. IANCU | green | “interpreted the statute to require a simple yes-or-no institution choice respecting a petition, embracing all challenges included in the petition.” | 4 |
| 5 | Biodelivery Scis. Int'l, Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. | green | “we agree that sas requires institution on all challenged claims and all challenged grounds.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.